against other folks in a small group. The idea was that you would spar with everybody, multiple times, regardless of height or weight. Who you were matched up against each day just kind of depended on who the instructor put you with. Even though they were supposed to mix things up, I often got picked to go against another guy named Alex, probably because we had the same name. Only problem was that the Other Alex was 4-5 inches taller than me. He was also younger than me and in better shape than me, so suffice to say, I didn't fare super well against Other Alex. But I did learn some important things while competing against him and afterwards, too.
Fighting someone taller than you is challenging. In boxing, or just about any other combat sport, competitors are divided into weight classes. This isn't just by chance. There is a reason for it. All things being equal, the bigger fighter has the advantage. But even within weight classes, there can be some pretty big disparities in terms of height/reach. And in the heavyweight divisions, there may be no limit or at the very least, be a long range of weight options. It's not abnormal to have 2 heavyweights fighting with a 20-50 pound weight difference. I often talk about my favorite boxer of all time, Mike Tyson, being shorter and generally smaller than every person he ever fought. Another Tyson, Tyson Fury will probably weigh in around 30 pounds heavier than Dillian Whyte for their championship bout this Saturday. In Fury's previous fight against Deontay Wilder, he came in 30 pounds heavier.
Let's look at some of the advantages taller fighters have over shorter opponents
But every physical or stylistic advantage comes with a disadvantage too:
Note of course that all taller fighters are not the same, nor are all shorter fighters. Each has a totally different skill set and certainly if you were going to fight anyone, you would want to know what that skill set is but these are the general differences most often seen.
So, the smaller fighter's goal is ultimately to exploit these differences. Let's take the first one as an easy example. The taller fighter may want to keep you away using their extended reach. They can hit you at a distance you can't hit them. A major advantage. So you need to be in one of two places- too far away for them to hit you or close enough so that you can hit them. Depending on your respective styles, it may make good sense for you to get in extra close and attack the body. Being in close eliminates their longer attacks and even make their shorter attacks, like hooks and uppercuts, less effective as they take a little longer to execute and may be easier to spot due to the longer, bigger limbs.
Looking at the next advantage- the taller fighter utilizing the jab- remember that they may punch at a downward trajectory and this leaves them more open. So, a classic example is your opponent jabbing and moving, using a classic outboxer technique, but if you time that jab and step in with your overhand, you will likely slip their jab and connect with your own, more powerful punch. It will be much harder for them to shoulder roll your overhand if they are punching at all downward. Even if it's a soutpaw vs. orthodox, the overhand punch can take away the taller fighter's dominant hand a little bit for this same reason. Look at the Oleksandr (yet another Alex!) Usyk vs. Anthony Joshua fight as a perfect example. But speaking of examples and overhands, you do have to be careful to not rely on any one technique too often without mixing things up. Any good fighter will get wise to your tactics and use them against you. I did a quick video about one such example involving the overhand in the Olympics last year - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V2JELt0wki4
Remember too that being shorter means that it is easier for you to duck or roll under punches plus harder for your taller opponent to do so. What's more is that may also bring their hands down, trying to hit a lower target that is getting lower still. That opens leaves their head open for strikes. Ali-Frazier 1 is yet another good film-study there as Frazier came from low to high to knock Ali down and win the fight with that lead hook.
A good rule of thumb is usually that a smaller fighter should be the busier, more aggressive fighter. Again, you have to consider your own style vs. your opponent's but often being smaller can mean that you are a little quicker and because of the range issues mentioned earlier, you are going to want to come forward and pressure your taller opponent. Makes a better impression in the judge's eyes too. But if you are matched up against someone taller who really wants to push forward and bring the fight to you, great! Bring it on! Because once they start moving forward, it will likely be harder to change directions rapidly so this gives you a great opportunity to try and catch them. Remember that you are the smaller target to hit too. Countering should be easier, especially if they are the aggressor.
There are plenty of great strategies like this you can employ as a smaller fighter but remember, your bigger opponent may know all this stuff too! They may even use it to try and trap you. And if you're generally a bigger, taller person yourself, make sure you know it and concentrate on using your advantages as well. This is the exciting chess game that is boxing!
One final note on this subject that is actually a question/comment I hear a lot from shorter people. They wonder if they should practice punching a higher, bigger target since in all likelihood, if they were to ever fight anybody, they would be fighting someone bigger. I think if you are indeed training for a specific fight, that makes some sense (more in sparring and mitts than the bag) but otherwise, the answer is NO. Even if you are 4 feet tall, it is important to learn the proper mechanics of each punch, which are based off of fighting someone our exact height. Punching naturally high will cause your form to suffer and limit your ability to learn and improve.
And one more truly "final" note: this all relates to boxing, specifically. There are similar advantages and disadvantages for all combat sports but in something like kickboxing, height generally matters more whereas in MMA, height, in and of itself, isn't as significant but size, mass, certainly can be. In any case, don't think that being smaller necessarily gives your opponent all the advantages. And your skill and toughness will always be the great equalizer! That being said though, I can't say as I would be in a big hurry for a rematch with Other Alex. That guy was pretty good, in addition to having an awesome name!
No comments:
Post a Comment